ArticlePloS one2025
Sustainable development of China's aesthetic teaching in long-term policy changes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The construction level of the teaching staff in aesthetic education determines the education quality, and relevant policies are the guarantee for the teaching staff construction. Due to multiple factors, the scientific formulation of aesthetic education policies in China is difficult and complex. The study objective is to enhance the role of policy in the teaching staff construction. This study was based on the theories proposed by MacDonald and Elmore, and 58 out of 1644 policy documents on the teaching staff construction in aesthetic education from 1978 to 2023 were selected to construct a two-dimensional analysis framework centered on policy instruments. The study indicated that the construction policy of China's teaching staff in aesthetic education focused on professional development, the level of issue institutions was constantly improving, and policy coordination was constantly enhancing. The application ratio of different policy instruments was unbalanced. The content distribution of China's aesthetic education policy was unbalanced. The selection of policy instruments by the Chinese government had a high degree of compatibility with policy content. This study provides reference for formulating scientific policies in the construction of the aesthetic education teacher team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.