Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41086198›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A novel skin pigment separation method based on sub-block selection and local clustering.

Huanyu Yang, Junzhu Zhang, Yan Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huanyu YangSchool of Science and Technology, Shanghai Open University, Shanghai, China.
Junzhu ZhangCollege of Information, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Yan MaCollege of Information, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4626-1401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin pigment separation is a key task in the fields of medical aesthetics, clinical analysis, and dermatological diagnosis. Existing pigment separation methods suffer from the problem of unclear separation between melanin and hemoglobin.

methodsThis study proposes a novel approach that combines a sub-block selection algorithm with local clustering for skin pigment separation. The sub-block selection algorithm sorts and filters sub-blocks based on the average pixel difference, reconstructing the input data to ensure accurate separation of melanin and hemoglobin. The local clustering method uses the Euclidean distance between sample points and their surrounding cluster centers to assign sample points to their respective clusters. A random sampling of sample points is performed from each cluster to ensure convergence of independent component analysis during the iteration process.

resultsExperimental evaluations demonstrate that the proposed method achieves accuracy and precise separation in skin pigment separation. Furthermore, the average success convergence rate of this approach reaches 92%, surpassing the performance of existing methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMelaninsSkinSkin PigmentationCluster AnalysisHemoglobinsHumansHemoglobinsMelanins

Identifiers

PMID41086198
PMCPMC12520397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.