ArticlePloS one2025
A novel skin pigment separation method based on sub-block selection and local clustering.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkin pigment separation is a key task in the fields of medical aesthetics, clinical analysis, and dermatological diagnosis. Existing pigment separation methods suffer from the problem of unclear separation between melanin and hemoglobin.
methodsThis study proposes a novel approach that combines a sub-block selection algorithm with local clustering for skin pigment separation. The sub-block selection algorithm sorts and filters sub-blocks based on the average pixel difference, reconstructing the input data to ensure accurate separation of melanin and hemoglobin. The local clustering method uses the Euclidean distance between sample points and their surrounding cluster centers to assign sample points to their respective clusters. A random sampling of sample points is performed from each cluster to ensure convergence of independent component analysis during the iteration process.
resultsExperimental evaluations demonstrate that the proposed method achieves accuracy and precise separation in skin pigment separation. Furthermore, the average success convergence rate of this approach reaches 92%, surpassing the performance of existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.