ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Deep learning detection of dynamic exocytosis events in fluorescence TIRF microscopy.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ExoFILT: transfer learning for robust and accelerated analysis of exocytosis single-particle tracking data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segmentation and detection of biological objects in fluorescence microscopy is of paramount importance in cell imaging. Deep learning approaches have recently shown promise to advance, automatize and accelerate analysis. However, most of the interest has been given to the segmentation of static objects of 2D/3D images whereas the segmentation of dynamic processes obtained from time-lapse acquisitions has been less explored. Here we adapted DeepFinder, a U-Net originally designed for 3D noisy cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) data, for the detection of rare dynamic exocytosis events (termed ExoDeepFinder) observed in temporal series of 2D Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy (TIRFM) images. ExoDeepFinder achieved good absolute performances with a relatively small training dataset of 12000 events in 60 cells. We rigorously compared deep learning performances with unsupervised conventional methods from the literature. ExoDeepFinder outcompeted the tested methods, but also exhibited a greater plasticity to the experimental conditions when tested under drug treatments and after changes in cell line or imaged reporter. This robustness to unseen experimental conditions did not require re-training demonstrating generalization capability of our deep learning model. ExoDeepFinder, as well as the annotated training datasets, were made transparent and available through an open-source software as well as a Napari plugin and can directly be applied to custom user data. The apparent plasticity and performances of ExoDeepFinder to detect dynamic events open new opportunities for future deep learning guided analysis of dynamic processes in live-cell imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.