ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Characterization and Management of Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion in Neonates: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurogenic Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion: A Systematic Review of Central and Pheripheral Nervous System Disorders.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM) is characterized by inappropriate adduction of the vocal folds during inspiration, causing inspiratory stridor and feeding challenges. Its nonspecific symptoms and frequent co-occurrence with other conditions make diagnosis challenging. While PVFM is described in older children, neonatal cases remain rare and poorly understood. Limited data exists regarding its incidence, clinical features, and optimal management strategies, and no universally accepted guidelines exist for diagnosing neonatal PVFM. CASE REPORT This case describes a term Hispanic male neonate diagnosed with PVFM at 18 days of life. The patient presented with persistent feeding difficulties, inspiratory stridor, and inadequate weight gain, requiring NICU admission. Flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FFL) confirmed intermittent PVFM without structural anomalies. Management included an interdisciplinary care team, who facilitated anti-reflux therapy, gavage feeding, and eventual gastrostomy tube placement for feeding safety and failure to thrive. Despite continued stridor, gradual improvement occurred, with near-complete oral intake by 2 months. Repeat FFL at 68 days after diagnosis demonstrated normal vocal fold mobility. CONCLUSIONS This case underscores diagnostic challenges and management complexities of neonatal PVFM. FFL remains critical for confirmation, and supportive care with anti-reflux therapy can facilitate resolution. While the precise etiology remains unclear, associations include gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), neurological immaturity, and irritant exposure. These factors, combined with lack of definitive etiology, complicate clinical assessment and long-term planning. Standardized guidelines and further research into demographic and clinical predictors of PVFM are needed, especially for neonatal patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.