ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
On the Influence of Apologies on the Likelihood of Lawsuits in Cases of Perceived Medical Negligence: Analysis of Archival and Experimental Data.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisappointing medical care (DMC) encompasses cases of medical failures, malpractice, or errors. Literature suggests that individuals' perceptions of harm resulting from medical procedures influence their intention to seek legal recourse and that apologies may mitigate the inclination for legal action.
objectiveHere, we aim to scrutinize and potentially challenge this prevailing notion.
methodsWe conducted 4 studies using a dataset of social media posts detailing possible DMC incidents to which we linked a proxy for legal action, specifically, future posts related to legal action. Study 1 used a machine learning model to predict a proxy for an intent to file a lawsuit based on the content of 3815 posts. Two preregistered crowdsourcing studies (N=1115) assessed the impact of different apology types on intention-to-sue in 10 diverse medical scenarios with 4 apology conditions. Finally, study 4 aimed to test whether the predictors of legal intent identified in the crowdsourced studies and modeled as a function of case attributes can generalize to an actual subset of 165 Reddit (Reddit, Inc) posts.
resultsResults show that apologies are rarely mentioned in descriptions of DMCs and that the descriptions of DMCs predict the proxy of legal action (area under the curve [AUC]=0.78). Crowdsourcing studies reinforce these findings: people agree on which cases are worthy of legal action (interclass agreement: 0.96 in study 1 and 0.71 in study 2), and our results demonstrate that physical and emotional damage are independently the strongest predictors of intention to file a lawsuit, together accounting for 43%-48% of model variance. Apologies are not statistically significant predictors for the intent to file a lawsuit (P>.05), both separately and in interaction with physical and emotional damage. A model developed in the crowdsourcing study and based on the attributes of cases, when applied to large-scale data, reached an AUC of 0.67-0.70. However, these attributes did not capture the entire range of behaviors, as a model that was based on the words in the cases reached a significantly higher AUC of 0.79.
conclusionsText-based apologies appear to exert little influence on individuals' intention to file a lawsuit in DMC cases, while physical and emotional damage are the primary motivators. This suggests that medical providers aiming to mitigate legal risks must explore alternative interventions beyond apologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.