ReviewRheumatology and therapy2025
Modern Management of Isolated Polymyalgia Rheumatica.
Review in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline comorbidity assessment may authorize early steroid-sparing therapy in older patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Review
- Age and neutrophil counts at the time of diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica: are they useful or confounding factors in the geriatrician's clinical practice?European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common inflammatory rheumatic disorder affecting those over 50 years of age. It is clinically heterogenous in both presentation and disease trajectory. Diagnostic complexity is heightened by the absence of a gold standard diagnostic test and the broad spectrum of disease mimics, posing challenges even for experienced rheumatologists. The primary goal of treatment is to restore health-related quality of life by achieving sustained symptom control, suppressing systemic inflammation, and minimising treatment-related toxicity. Despite advances in our understanding of PMR, glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the cornerstone of therapy. However, frequent relapses and prolonged treatment courses in many patients result in high cumulative GC exposure with associated adverse effects, which is of particular concern in this older, typically frailer and more vulnerable patient cohort. The urgent need for effective GC-sparing agents has resulted in pivotal developments over the past decade, notably the SAPHYR trial, which supported the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of sarilumab as the first biologic therapy for refractory PMR. This represents a major shift in the therapeutic landscape, with several biologic agents now under investigation. These advances, however, highlight gaps in the current management, including the need for rapid access pathways and specialist rheumatologist evaluation in all cases of suspected PMR to facilitate an early and accurate diagnosis, stratified treatment approaches and the accurate detection of a coexisting giant cell arteritis. Furthermore, standardised definitions of relapse and remission, alongside structured monitoring protocols, are lacking. This review explores current diagnostic and treatment strategies for isolated PMR. We also highlight unmet needs in PMR management, and discuss future directions aimed at improving outcomes and redefining the care pathway for PMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.