ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Outcomes of carinal sleeve resection versus primary suturing in post-pneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Outcomes of carinal sleeve resection versus primary suturing in post‑pneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula".Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Survival impact of pN2a and pN2b nodal status in stage IIB-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer under the 9Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) is a serious postoperative complication following pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), significantly impacting morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of carinal sleeve resection and primary suturing techniques in the surgical management of BPF, with a focus on complication rates, early mortality, and long-term survival. This retrospective study analyzed 33 patients who developed BPF after pneumonectomy for NSCLC between 2019 and 2024 at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical intervention employed: Group A (carinal sleeve resection) and Group B (primary suturing). Postoperative morbidity, 30-day mortality, re-fistulization rates, and long-term survival were assessed. The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A (p = 0.016), and 30-day mortality was also lower in this group (p = 0.035). Group B exhibited a higher rate of re-fistulization (p = 0.024). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of 5-year overall survival (p = 0.606). Carinal sleeve resection may offer a favorable alternative in selected patients with BPF, with reduced early mortality and shorter hospitalization. While long-term survival was comparable between techniques, individualized surgical planning based on patient-specific factors remains essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41085884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.