ArticleCell and tissue banking2025
Three-dimensionally decellularized human amniotic membrane scaffold: structure, processing, and biological properties.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Two Methods for Decellularizing Human Amniotic Membranes for Use in Tissue Engineering.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and their acellular derivatives in cutaneous wound healing and pathological scarring: a narrative review.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Review
- Recent advances on anti-scarring properties of amniotic membrane: emerging strategies and clinical potentials in regenerative medicine.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Advances in the application of human amniotic membrane for tissue repair.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2026Review
- Characterization of exosomes from hypoxia-activated human amniotic membrane mesenchymal stem cells.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering (TE) combines cells, biomaterials, and bioactive molecules to create functional tissue constructs aimed at restoring tissue function and improving patient outcomes. The human amniotic membrane (HAM) is a widely studied biological scaffold for various biomedical applications. Decellularization of HAM (dHAM) is necessary to reduce graft rejection but depletes stem cells and growth factors, potentially limiting regenerative potential. This study investigates the recellularization of dHAM with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AdMSCs) to enhance its bioactivity using a novel 3D seeding technique. Decellularized HAM (dHAM) was recellularized with AdMSCs employing a novel 3D seeding method to achieve uniform cell distribution within the scaffold. The viability, differentiation potential, and morphology of AdMSCs were assessed in both 2D and 3D culture systems. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the differentiation capacity of AdMSCs into osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic lineages. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) was utilized to analyze cell morphology and penetration depth within the scaffold. AdMSC viability was comparable between 2 and 3D cultures, indicating that dHAM scaffolds effectively support cell survival regardless of the culture technique. The composition and properties of dHAM preserved cell functions in both culture systems. Flow cytometry confirmed the multilineage differentiation potential of AdMSCs. FESEM imaging revealed AdMSCs with extending filopodia on the scaffold surface and cell penetration up to 17.68 µm into the dHAM matrix. The successful 3D recellularization of dHAM with AdMSCs demonstrates its potential as a biological scaffold for stem cell delivery. This approach holds promise for tissue repair and wound healing applications, enhancing the regenerative efficacy of dHAM-based constructs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41085865What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.