ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Adoption and implementation of robotic surgery in Türkiye: a multi-level qualitative analysis of individual, institutional, and systemic dynamics.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to offer a multilayered assessment of the adoption and implementation of robotic surgery (RS) in Türkiye by centring surgeons' individual experiences while concurrently examining institutional conditions and broader health-system factors. Using a qualitative design, we conducted in-depth interviews with 24 surgeons selected via criterion sampling. The data were analyzed using an interpretative phenomenological approach and coded through thematic analysis. The findings indicate that the interplay between individual motivations, institutional capacity/regulations, and system-level incentives and constraints influences the use of RS. RS emerges both as a technical innovation and as a reconfiguration of professional practice. Effective and equitable integration will require standardized and scalable training-accreditation pathways, sustainable financing and reimbursement models, and strengthened ethical and transparent governance mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41085813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.