ArticleDysphagia2026
The Effect of Compensatory Strategies in Reducing to Postoperative Airway Invasion, and Pharyngeal Residue in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few studies have reported the effects of dysphagia management after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer. We aimed to investigate the impact of liquid modification and chin-tuck posture (head flexion) on reducing airway invasion and pharyngeal residue after esophagectomy. We included patients who underwent esophagectomy between June 2017 and January 2020. A videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) was conducted on 5 ml liquid boluses with four viscosities: thin, mildly thickened, moderately thickened, and extremely thickened, all administered in a neutral head position. Trials with thin and moderately thickened liquid were repeated with head flexion. The penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) scores and residue grades were compared across viscosities and head positions. Thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 65.3 ± 9.0 years). Moderately and extremely thickened liquids resulted in less frequent penetration or aspiration compared to thin liquids, while mildly thickened liquids showed no significant difference in airway protection. Residue grades did not differ significantly across the viscosities tested. Head flexion did not affect the occurrence of aspiration or residue grades compared with the neutral head position for thin and moderately thickened liquids. Penetration on thin liquid was less frequent in head flexion than in the neutral position. Liquid modification improved swallowing safety by reducing penetration and aspiration without affecting pharyngeal clearance. While the chin-tuck posture did not significantly reduce aspiration, its potential to lessen penetration suggests a role in airway protection that warrants further study. These findings warrant validation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.