ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Mapping the future of early breast cancer diagnosis: a bibliometric analysis of AI innovations.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) remains one of the most prevalent and challenging malignancies worldwide, affecting millions of women and shaping healthcare priorities across continents. Advances in early detection have significantly improved survival rates. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in this domain, transforming traditional diagnostic methods. Initially based on simple rule-based systems, AI has evolved into sophisticated deep learning models capable of analyzing complex medical data with remarkable accuracy. This bibliometric analysis examines the application of AI in the early diagnosis of breast cancer, aiming to understand not only the current state of the field but also its growth over the past decade. Publications indexed in Web of Science and Scopus from 2012 to March 2025 were systematically reviewed, while earlier literature (1994-2012) provided historical context. Tools such as Biblioshiny and VOSviewer were used to map research trends, collaboration patterns, and thematic evolution. Out of 1,436 initial documents, 1,293 high-quality studies were included. The results show a clear acceleration in AI-focused research after 2020, with increased global collaboration and a notable shift toward open-access publication. Recurring themes such as "machine learning," "diagnostic imaging," and "clinical decision support" highlight the field's direction. As AI becomes more integrated into clinical workflows, its potential to enhance diagnostic speed, consistency, and personalization is undeniable. However, key ethical issues such as bias, transparency, and patient data protection remain central to responsible implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.