ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
NIPA1 depletion in tumor-associated macrophages via IGFBP2/EGFR attenuates acute myeloid leukemia progression and chemoresistance.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-driven M2 macrophage signature for precision prediction of survival and therapy response in acute myeloid leukemia.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Macrophage Plasticity: Phenotypic and Functional Profiles Across Pathological Microenvironments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive and heterogenous malignancy, with unsatisfactory clinical outcomes even with very intensive treatment strategies. Previous research has revealed that Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome 1 (NIPA1) is highly expressed in patients with AML and is negatively correlated with overall survival. However, studies on the molecular mechanism of NIPA1 in AML remain limited. To explore the role of NIPA1and its molecular mechanism in AML, we discovered through cellular experiments that NIPA1 was upregulated in M2 macrophages. NIPA1 knockdown inhibited M2 macrophage polarization and the survival of AML cells. In animal experiments, we also found that NIPA1 depletion restricted tumor growth in mice with AML. Further studies indicated that NIPA1 knockdown inhibited IGFBP2/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in M2 macrophages, thereby weakening leukemia cell survival and reducing anthracycline resistance. Using both parental HL-60 and an adriamycin-resistant (HL-60/ADR) model, we show that TAM-targeted NIPA1 depletion enhances chemosensitivity and attenuates AML progression. Thus, NIPA1 could be used as a potential therapeutic strategy for immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.