Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41085669›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2025

Analysis of disruptive action of electrical current on cell membrane integrity and modelling its antimicrobial activity.

Zeynep Gergin, Fatih Tarlak, Bengü Erguden

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zeynep GerginDepartment of Bioengineering, Gebze Technical University, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Fatih TarlakDepartment of Bioengineering, Gebze Technical University, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey. ftarlak@gtu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-1865
Bengü ErgudenDepartment of Bioengineering, Gebze Technical University, 41400, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey. b.sezen@gtu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8621-3474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is essential to eliminate harmful microbes from vital aspects of our lives, including dental instruments and other healthcare devices, cosmetics, foods, and products that come into contact with them. Electrical stimulation (ES) has been proposed to address the recent problems of developing resistance to chemical antimicrobial agents. Therefore, additional research is needed to determine the ideal voltage and exposure time for this application, and it would be beneficial to have a predictive tool for its use. In this study, different voltages were applied for various time periods to determine whether electrical stimulation at different ES levels could inhibit the growth of Gram-negative E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and Gram-positive S. aureus, S. epidermidis. Bacterial growth was significantly inhibited by ES application for all strains. Different zones of inhibition were demonstrated by the cathode and anode. Next, we examined the effect of ES on bacterial cell membrane integrity. Our data indicate that ES treatment disrupts the cell membrane integrity of E. coli and S. aureus cells. We then analyzed and modeled the inhibition zone diameter data using three machine learning regression. support vector regression, random forest regression, and Gaussian process regression (GPR). The GPR method proved to be the best-performing machine learning model and was therefore used to develop software that predicts inhibition zone diameters based on given predictive values. In conclusion, our results indicate that ES is an effective antimicrobial application that disrupts cell membrane and we believe that it can effectively be used for sterilization and infection management.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCell MembraneElectric StimulationEscherichia coliMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibacterialCell membrane integrityElectrical currentElectrical stimulationMachine learningModelling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.