Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41085612›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2025

Effects of Intensity and Fatigue on the Kinetics and Kinematics of the Barbell Squat, Bench Press, and Deadlift in Experienced Lifters: A Systematic Review.

Javad A Bakhshinejad, Jared D Ramer, Kristen A Dunsmore, Luke M Pelton, Lars Berglund

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Research on a muscle fatigue quantification based on an improved critical power model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Load matters: squat and deadlift mechanics near maximal effort.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Javad A BakhshinejadDepartment of Exercise Science, Springfield College, Springfield, MA, United States of America.
Jared D RamerDepartment of Exercise Science, Springfield College, Springfield, MA, United States of America.
Kristen A DunsmoreDepartment of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States of America.
Luke M PeltonDepartment of Exercise Science, Springfield College, Springfield, MA, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4954-854X
Lars BerglundDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation Umeå, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden. lars.berglund@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-2182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPowerlifting is a competitive strength sport focused on achieving the highest possible single-repetition load in three barbell lifts: the back squat, bench press, and deadlift, each testing maximal force output under standardized conditions. Increases in training intensity and the accumulation of fatigue can lead to measurable alterations in kinetic and kinematic variables, with potential implications for both performance and injury risk. Although trained lifters typically exhibit more stable movement patterns than novices, the biomechanical responses to intensity and fatigue remain complex and variable. This systematic review aimed to identify consistent, observable changes in kinetic and kinematic variables in experienced lifters during the back squat, bench press, and deadlift under conditions of increasing intensity and fatigue.

methodsA keyword search was performed on MEDLINE Complete, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL Plus up to June 2024. Studies that examined the effects of load and fatigue on the kinetics and kinematics of the back squat, bench press, and deadlift in experienced lifters were included. The quality of studies was rated according to the Quality Assessment of Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies scale. Results were summarized in tables and with a narrative synthesis.

resultsTwenty-two studies, with a total of 293 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Increased intensity was consistently associated with decreases in mean and peak barbell velocity and power, increased force production, longer concentric durations, and greater joint variability, especially in the acceleration and sticking regions. Fatigue led to similar reductions in velocity and power, although findings on force production were inconsistent across studies. Only two studies examined the deadlift, and reporting practices varied between studies.

conclusionIncreased intensity and fatigue produce predictable kinetic and kinematic changes in the back squat, bench press, and deadlift, particularly during the acceleration and sticking phases. Velocity consistently decreased with intensity and fatigue, while power and joint mechanics showed greater variability across individuals and studies. Coaches and clinicians should monitor these changes to inform programming and technical interventions. However, different lifters may adopt distinct mechanical strategies as intensity increases, especially near the sticking point. Future research should distinguish between- and within-individual variability in kinetic and kinematic expression and address underrepresented movements, particularly the deadlift. REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024550339).

Indexed as

BiomechanicsForcePowerliftingStrengthVelocity

Identifiers

PMID41085612
PMCPMC12521083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.