SynthesisEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Functional recovery in older adults following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine the domain-specific functional, psychological, and cognitive recovery outcomes in older adults aged ≥ 65 years after mild traumatic brain injury.
findingsAcross 18 studies (3549 participants), fewer than half of the older adults regained full functional independence by 6 months, and many had persistent mood symptoms and cognitive deficits up to 1 year. Global tools such as the GOSE reveal wide measurement heterogeneity and an under-recognized burden. MESSAGE: Mild traumatic brain injury is seldom "mild" in older adults. Geriatrics-tailored, multidimensional assessment and follow-up could improve rehabilitation and guide practice. PURPOSE: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in older adults is increasingly common and associated with long-term functional, psychological, and cognitive impairment, especially in those with frailty and multimorbidity. Traditional outcome measures may underestimate the long-term burden in this patient population. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on domain-specific functional recovery outcomes in older adults with mTBI with emphasis on physical function, depression, and cognition.
methodsA systematic search of Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted through 6 October 2024. Observational studies reporting functional outcomes in older adults ≥ 65 years post-mTBI were included. Study quality was assessed using the Quality of Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool.
resultsEighteen studies (three thousand five hundred forty-nine participants) were included. Persistent impairments in activity and participation were observed in up to 66% at 6 months post-injury. Approximately 24% experienced at least mild depression, and 9% had moderate-to-severe anxiety. Cognitive recovery was heterogeneous, with residual deficits in processing speed, memory, and executive function. Standard global measures such as GOSE frequently failed to detect domain-specific impairments, especially in psychosocial and cognitive domains.
conclusionOlder adults with mTBI frequently experience prolonged and incomplete recovery across multiple domains, which often goes undetected by traditional outcome measures. Given the multidimensional burden observed, comprehensive geriatric assessment and interdisciplinary follow-up could help align care to patient needs. Future research should include adults aged ≥ 80 years, adopt multidimensional tools, and extend follow-up to better guide tailored rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41085584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.