ReviewDiscover oncology2025
Endometrial cancer: from clinical reality to molecular treatment.
Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and targeted therapies in endometrial cancer: Molecular classification-driven treatment strategies (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Breaking barriers in gynecologic malignancies with adoptive cell transfers and nanomedicine.Cell biomaterials · 2026Article
- Telomere-driven dysfunctional changes in gynecological cancers: mechanistic insights, biomarker potential, and therapeutic targeting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most prevalent gynecological malignancy in developed countries, with incidence rates steadily increasing due to factors such as obesity, aging populations, and changes in reproductive behavior. While mortality rates have remained relatively stable, survival outcomes have improved little in recent years, underscoring the need for advancements in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of both the clinical and fundamental aspects of EC, aiming to bridge the gap between biological research and clinical practice. On the clinical side, we assess genetic predispositions, hormonal and metabolic risk factors, classification systems, detection methods, treatment options, and their impact on survival and quality of life. From a research perspective, we highlight the models commonly used to study EC, including cell lines and animal models, and delve into the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, a critical driver of tumor progression and a promising therapeutic target. By synthesizing these insights, this review aims to inform future efforts to improve patient outcomes and advance the understanding of EC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.