ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Reframing EHR Policy in China: Towards Balanced Implementation and Ethical Foundations.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision management of gastrointestinal tumor-associated osteoporosis driven by cutting-edge technologies: Current status, challenges, and future prospects.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- [The potential of medical comics in rheumatology-Results of a standardized survey at the German Rheumatology Congress 2024].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveElectronic Health Record (EHR) systems are a core component of healthcare informatization, playing a crucial role in the development of digital and smart healthcare. This study utilizes policy tool theory to analyse policies related to China's EHR system. By gaining a deep understanding of the mechanisms of policy impact, we believe we can better guide the development direction of EHR systems, optimize resource allocation, and improve system effectiveness and efficiency. Ultimately, this will make a substantial contribution to the construction of healthcare informatization.
methodsThe research employs Christopher Hood's 'NATO' model of policy tools to construct a three-dimensional analytical framework. A total of 427 relevant policy documents were retrieved and screened from the PKULAW.COM and WWW.GOV.COM databases. NVivo 14 software was used for text mining and quantitative analysis.
resultsThe study reveals that authority tools (36.88%) dominate across most policy objectives, particularly in improving healthcare quality and promoting technological innovation. Nodality tools (27.90%) also demonstrate significant influence in enhancing healthcare quality and fostering technological innovation. Organization tools (21.75%) reflect governmental efforts in institutional development and organizational coordination. While economic tools (13.48%) show a lower overall frequency of use, they are applied relatively more in objectives related to rational resource allocation.
conclusionRecommendations include optimizing the government's role and balancing the use of authority tools; refining the policy objective system with increased attention to ethical issues; and strengthening the synergistic application of policy tools to enhance policy implementation effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.