ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2025
Using abandoned model systems and historical literature to teach modern concepts and techniques in cell biology.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cell biology literature of the 19th and early-to-mid 20th centuries is full of the seminal works that were critical for the development of our current understanding of biology but were done using model systems that are no longer commonly used. We argue that these historical papers are ideal for the development of course-based research experiences, both because the background work is conceptually and technically straightforward, and because the study of the abandoned systems stopped prior to the availability of modern techniques. These abandoned systems offer outstanding opportunities for teaching modern light and electron microscopy techniques, thus providing students with opportunities to create new knowledge in cell biology. In addition, the authors of the early work are interesting subjects for storytelling, which can increase student engagement with a research topic and identification as a scientist. Here we report on the design of a course-based research class built on several foundational works including the early works of Hermann Henking, Michael J.D. White, Edmund Beecher Wilson, Sally Hughes-Schrader, and others that provide students with the same technical training they previously received in the cookbook lab. Students are trained to image both living and fixed spermatocytes, to prepare, section, and image specimens for electron microscopy, and to contribute to the publication of the research that is combined with the training. In the multiple iterations of the class, students also explored chromosome alignment during cell division and other cytological features such as mitochondrial structure and fusion during spermatogenesis. Students note that they value learning the techniques and scientific principles, in addition to exploring the unknown and creating new scientific knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.