Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41085285›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2025

Using abandoned model systems and historical literature to teach modern concepts and techniques in cell biology.

Leocadia V Paliulis, Gunar Fabig, Sandra Stein, Silke Tulok, Anja Nobst, Chukwuebuka William Okafornta, Thomas Kurth, Thomas Müller-Reichert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leocadia V PaliulisBiology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8244-7548
Gunar FabigExperimental Center, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3017-0978
Sandra SteinCore Facility Cellular Imaging, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Silke TulokCore Facility Cellular Imaging, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-1473-6427
Anja NobstCore Facility Cellular Imaging, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-7468-180X
Chukwuebuka William OkaforntaExperimental Center, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8094-1254
Thomas KurthCore Facility Electron Microscopy and Histology Facility, Technology Platform, Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5624-1717
Thomas Müller-ReichertExperimental Center, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0203-1436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell biology literature of the 19th and early-to-mid 20th centuries is full of the seminal works that were critical for the development of our current understanding of biology but were done using model systems that are no longer commonly used. We argue that these historical papers are ideal for the development of course-based research experiences, both because the background work is conceptually and technically straightforward, and because the study of the abandoned systems stopped prior to the availability of modern techniques. These abandoned systems offer outstanding opportunities for teaching modern light and electron microscopy techniques, thus providing students with opportunities to create new knowledge in cell biology. In addition, the authors of the early work are interesting subjects for storytelling, which can increase student engagement with a research topic and identification as a scientist. Here we report on the design of a course-based research class built on several foundational works including the early works of Hermann Henking, Michael J.D. White, Edmund Beecher Wilson, Sally Hughes-Schrader, and others that provide students with the same technical training they previously received in the cookbook lab. Students are trained to image both living and fixed spermatocytes, to prepare, section, and image specimens for electron microscopy, and to contribute to the publication of the research that is combined with the training. In the multiple iterations of the class, students also explored chromosome alignment during cell division and other cytological features such as mitochondrial structure and fusion during spermatogenesis. Students note that they value learning the techniques and scientific principles, in addition to exploring the unknown and creating new scientific knowledge.

Indexed as

abandoned modelcourse-based research experiencehistorical literaturemicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID41085285
PMCPMC12687641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.