Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41085244›Full record

SynthesisThe International journal of eating disorders2026

Identification and Management of Binge-Eating Disorder and Bulimia Nervosa in Primary Care Settings: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Healthcare Professionals' and Patients' Perceptions.

Stella Kozmér, Christopher O'Rouke, Natalia S Lawrence, Jane R Smith, Samantha B van Beurden

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stella KozmérUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2121-5022
Christopher O'RoukeDorset Healthcare NHS University Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9248-543X
Natalia S LawrenceDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1969-6637
Jane R SmithUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5658-9334
Samantha B van BeurdenUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7848-2159

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research C062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand how the identification and management of binge-eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN) in primary care settings are perceived by both patients and healthcare professionals, and how rates of identification and referral for support may be improved.

methodsA systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted. Eight databases were searched in August 2025. Studies were excluded if they focused on secondary or tertiary care, patients under the age of 16, or anorexia nervosa. Data on sample, type of eating disorder, year of publication, and country were extracted, and thematic synthesis was used to synthesize the data. The quality of studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research.

resultsTwenty-five studies were included. Four articles were of high quality; the rest (N = 21) were medium with a moderate risk of bias. Most of the studies were from the United Kingdom (N = 9), with 14 focusing on healthcare professionals' and 13 on patients' perspectives. The main factors influencing the identification and management of BED/BN were identified to be knowledge and understanding of the conditions, healthcare professional-patient interactions, attitudes and emotions toward BED/BN and the healthcare system, and the existence and accessibility of treatment and referral pathways. DISCUSSION: The interaction of these factors is discussed in relation to the literature, and gaps in research and clinical practice are identified, such as a limited separation of eating disorder categories, which could help inform the development of strategies to improve the identification and management of BED and BN.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBinge-Eating DisorderBulimia NervosaHealth PersonnelPrimary Health CareHumansQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultationbinge‐eating disorderbulimia nervosaidentificationmanagementprimary carequalitativesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41085244
PMCPMC12773673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.