Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41085206›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2025

Land Use Impacts on Local and Regional Freshwater Biodiversity Can Compromise Current Management Goals.

Heikki Mykrä, Anna Suuronen, Jukka Aroviita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heikki MykräFinnish Environment Institute, Nature Solutions, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6576-5563
Anna SuuronenFinnish Environment Institute, Nature Solutions, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2726-229X
Jukka AroviitaFinnish Environment Institute, Marine and Freshwater Solutions, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3330-0731

Funding

Ministry of Environment VN/14341/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land use and other anthropogenic activities are degrading freshwater ecosystems and their biodiversity worldwide. Although results from long-term monitoring networks suggest that freshwater biodiversity may not be undergoing significant change, information about how freshwater biodiversity has changed and the effectiveness of current environmental goals remains limited. We used nationwide survey data of stream diatoms, macroinvertebrates, and lake diatoms, macroinvertebrates, and macrophytes to examine how land use has changed freshwater biodiversity in Finland and how effective good ecological status class, that is, the main environmental goal for freshwater ecosystems in the European Union, is for protecting biodiversity. We employed RIVPACS-type multitaxon distribution models with independent validation sites to assess observed to expected ratios of local taxa (O/E) as well as differences in observed and expected regional frequencies of taxa. Land use negatively impacted local diversity of both examined stream communities (mean difference in O/E to near natural reference streams > 0.076), while lake communities were affected by only agriculture and multiple pressures (mean difference in O/E to near natural reference lakes > 0.093). Regional taxon prevalences were significantly reduced in all land use groups for diatoms (21%-61% of taxa), lake macrophytes (21%-39%), and macroinvertebrates (11%-65%), but also increased particularly for diatom (24%-26%) and macrophyte (29%) species in agricultural areas. Species with decreased frequency were generally sensitive species, while species that increased in their frequency were tolerant species typical for mesotrophic or eutrophic conditions. In the good ecological status class, frequencies were also changed, and for some groups such as stream macroinvertebrates, there were substantial changes (66% of taxa declined), indicating that the current management goal may be partially insufficient to protect freshwater biodiversity. Our study highlights that there is a need to incorporate freshwater biodiversity in the environmental objectives to ensure effective conservation and restoration efforts.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsBiodiversityFresh WaterAgricultureAnimal DistributionAnimalsAquatic OrganismsConservation of Natural ResourcesDiatomsEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringFinlandHumansInvertebratesModels, StatisticalNatural Resourcesaquatic biodiversitybioassessmentbiomonitoringlakesspecies distributionsstreams

Identifiers

PMID41085206
PMCPMC12519942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.