ArticleThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2025
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Histopathological Classification in Colorectal Polyps.
Article in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A synthetic oversampling-based customized ResNet51-Conv1D framework for early colorectal cancer prediction using structured clinical data from the PLCO screening trial.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Nocturnal Melatonin Deficiency in Colorectal Cancer: Independent Predictive Value Beyond Sleep Quality.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Comment on Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Histopathological Classification in Colorectal Polyps.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Increased Prevalence of Colonic Polyps in Patients with Ampullary Adenoma or Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Colorectal polyps are precursor lesions of colorectal cancer, and their histopathological types are critical for determining malignant potential. Predicting polyp histopathological types may support early and appropriate clinical management. Machine learning (ML) algorithms based on accessible demographic, clinical, and lifestyle data can contribute to individualized screening strategies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 491 individuals who underwent colonoscopy for the first time between 2022 and 2025 at University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital. Demographic and clinical data were recorded, and dietary habits were assessed using the Food Frequency Questionnaire. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to histopathology: adenomatous polyp, hyperplastic polyp, and no polyp. Four ML algorithms-decision tree, random forest, support vector machines (SVMs), and extreme gradient boosting-were applied. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, kappa statistic, and McNemar's test. Variable contributions were further analyzed with SHapley Additive exPlanations. Results: Accuracy ranged from 70.9% to 76.4%, with the highest performance from SVM (76.4%) and random forest (75.7%). Extreme gradient boosting showed lower overall accuracy (70.9%) but was the only model that identified hyperplastic polyps. The no polyp group was consistently predicted with high accuracy (sensitivity 85.6%-95.9%). Precision for adenomatous polyps was highest with SVM (71.4%). SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis highlighted frequent bulgur consumption (>2 times/week), red meat intake, age, and body mass index as major predictors. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms can predict colorectal polyp histopathological types using routine demographic, clinical, and dietary data, enabling more personalized and effective screening beyond age-based protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.