ArticleJournal of morphology2025
Machine Learning Quantifies Fine-Scale Hairiness in Shore Flies (Diptera: Ephydridae).
Article in Journal of morphology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Morphological analysis of fine structures on small insects is often labor intensive, scale-limited, and biased by sampling or organismal life history. We used a pixel classification machine-learning workflow with the open source programs Ilastik and Fiji to identify and quantify microtrichia in semiaquatic shore flies (Ephydridae). This methodology semi-automates quantification of hairs by counting objects or groups of class-assigned pixels and determining their percent coverage at a given magnification using scanning electron micrographs. Our results are consistent with manual counts, with Paracoenia species that tolerate hot springs having more hairs than less aquatic Parydra. However, Paracoenia hairs tend to be shorter, and the percent coverage of microtrichia per unit surface area did not differentiate species except for the anterior thoracic spiracle. Our workflow is adaptable for use in other taxonomic groups or beyond the quantification of hairs, with the upper limits of applicability determined by overlap in the feature of interest. As molecular datasets continue to grow and proliferate in the multi-omics age, efficient morphological workflows become even more critical to allowing proportionally robust, complementary biological inferences grounded in phenotypic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.