Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084998›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

How Population Structure and Nest Membership Shape Pathogen Patterns in Bumble Bees.

Jana Dobelmann, Lena Wilfert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jana DobelmannInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6742-0945
Lena WilfertInstitute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-458X

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 864642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host density, genetic diversity and social groups are key factors influencing pathogen transmission in wildlife populations, but their interactions remain poorly understood in insects. Islands can provide natural laboratories with distinct populations that vary in density and genetic diversity, whereby dense, genetically homogeneous populations are expected to facilitate pathogen transmission. We used bumble bees to test these predictions, assessing the population structure of the two common species Bombus pascuorum and B. terrestris across island and mainland sites in the British Isles and France and testing bees for five micro-parasitic and four viral pathogens. B. pascuorum formed distinct genetic clusters on islands, with varying levels of heterozygosity and only the Isle of Arran clustered with mainland populations. B. terrestris populations were less structured, but populations on the Isle of Man and the Scilly Isles were genetically separated from other island and mainland populations while showing low heterozygosity. Colony density was similar between species and not linked to genetic diversity but had a positive effect on the prevalence of some pathogens. Contrary to expectations, there was no protective effect of high genetic diversity, suggesting that generalist bumble bee pathogens could be more affected by host species diversity and density. Yet, within B. terrestris populations, we found that nestmates showed more similar pathogen profiles than unrelated individuals, suggesting that genetic similarity and high contact rates within nests affect pathogen prevalence in wild bees.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationAnimalsBeesFranceGenetic VariationPopulation Densitybumble beedensitygenetic diversitypathogenpopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID41084998
PMCPMC12617071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.