ArticlePublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)
A Benchmarking Dashboard System With Supervisory Public Health Nurses: An Implementation Study.
Article in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Benchmarking Dashboard System With Supervisory Public Health Nurses: An Implementation Study.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study demonstrated the usability of a co-designed benchmarking dashboard for supervisory public health nurses (PHNs) and their staff and identified supervisory PHNs' management challenges and strategies for system use.
designDescriptive case study. SAMPLE: Fifty-seven PHNs from three municipalities participated in the study using snowball sampling. MEASUREMENTS: Feedback was collected before, during, and after the dashboard development on the Kintone app. Participant attrition and System Usability Scale (SUS) scores were used to evaluate the dashboard's feasibility and usability using descriptive statistics. Content analysis was conducted to identify supervisory PHNs' management challenges and strategies for system use.
resultsThere were no dropouts. The dashboard achieved an SUS score of 67.5, slightly higher than that of the existing system (66.0). Management challenges included human resource development, managing numerous individual cases, and conducting communityased activities. Dashboard use strategies included advancing evidence-based human resource development and strengthening data-driven management.
conclusionsPer the findings, strategies for developing the benchmarking dashboard supported evidence-based workforce management and promoted reflective practices, suggesting that dashboard systems can enhance supervisory PHNs' leadership and improve the quality and equity of community health services.
trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000051509 [https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058761].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.