ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2025
Trends of Urinary Catheterization in Korea From 2010 to 2021: Population Based Data Analysis.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate temporal changes in urinary catheterization practices by analyzing prescription patterns over the past decade.
methodsUsing nationwide claims data from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service between 2010 and 2021, we examined the total number of prescriptions and their distribution by catheterization method (Foley catheterization, Nelaton catheterization, and suprapubic cystostomy), sex, type of medical institution, and age group (5-year intervals).
resultsThe overall number of catheterization prescriptions steadily increased during the study period. Foley catheterization was most frequently performed, followed by Nelaton catheterization, while percutaneous and open cystostomy accounted for a negligible proportion. The relative distribution remained stable over 12 years, with Foley catheterization comprising ~70%, Nelaton catheterization ~30%, and cystostomy ~0.2%. Catheterization rates rose sharply after age 60 in both sexes, with an additional modest increase among females aged 24-44. Most procedures were performed in tertiary and general hospitals, with minimal use in primary care. On a per-patient basis, Foley catheterization was more common in females, whereas Nelaton catheterization predominated in males. Cystostomy was prescribed over four times more frequently in males than in females.
conclusionsDespite evolving recommendations and clinical guidelines, the relative proportions of catheterization methods have remained largely unchanged over the past 12 years. Age and sex exert significant influence on catheterization patterns. Strategies to expand the use of intermittent catheterization relative to indwelling catheters appear warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.