ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2025
Awareness, knowledge, and attitudes toward polygenic risk scores for breast cancer in multiethnic high-risk cohorts of women.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo examine awareness, knowledge, and attitudes toward breast cancer (BC) polygenic risk scores (PRS) in women with high risk.
methodsWe surveyed women without BC enrolled in the Chicago Multiethnic Epidemiologic BC Cohort and Cancer Prone Registry between July and September 2024. PRS awareness was defined as having ever read/heard about PRS and discussed PRS with a provider. PRS knowledge scores range from 0 to 11. Higher scores indicate better knowledge. We also asked to what extent participants agreed that PRS testing should be offered to the general population or a routine part of BC risk assessment and how likely receiving PRS would influence their risk management behaviors.
resultsOf 828 women, 18.5% had read/heard about PRS, and 13.2% discussed PRS with a provider. Non-Hispanic White women scored slightly higher on PRS knowledge than Non-Hispanic Black and multiracial/other women. Higher education (P-trend < .001) and income (P-trend = .002) levels were associated with increased knowledge scores. More than 90.0% agreed/strongly agreed that PRS testing should be offered to the general population or a routine part of risk assessment. In total, 94.0% reported that PRS receipt would likely/very likely influence their risk management behaviors.
conclusionThis study suggests an opportunity for tailored PRS education interventions and the need to improve patient-provider communication and knowledge gaps when implementing genetic testing to increase personalized BC screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.