Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084798›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2025

Fluid removal intensity in intermittent hemodialysis for acute kidney injury: net ultrafiltration rate characterization and outcomes.

Lisa K Paxton, Tom Larsen, Timothy Fazio, Nigel D Toussaint, Rinaldo Bellomo, Emily J See

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa K PaxtonDepartment of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
Tom LarsenHealth Intelligence Unit, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
Timothy FazioHealth Intelligence Unit, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
Nigel D ToussaintDepartment of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoDepartment of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
Emily J SeeDepartment of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI), excessive net ultrafiltration (NUF) rates >1.75 mL/kg/h have been associated with increased mortality, delayed AKI recovery and complications of hemodynamic instability. There is limited information on fluid removal practices and NUF rates in AKI patients treated with intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). We conducted a retrospective study of AKI patients who underwent IHD at our center between 2020 and 2023. The primary outcome was NUF rate, assessed as body weight-scaled, body surfaces area-scaled and unadjusted values. Secondary outcomes included mortality and measures of renal recovery at 90 days (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], major adverse kidney events [MAKE], IHD dependence and days to liberation from IHD). We studied 74 patients (median age 62 years [IQR 46-71], median baseline eGFR 81 mL/min/1.73 m Among AKI patients, median NUF rates during IHD was higher than reported for CRRT and influenced by comorbidity and pre-morbid eGFR. At 90 days, MAKE was common, two thirds of patients had

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryIntermittent Renal Replacement TherapyRenal DialysisAgedFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUltrafiltrationAcute kidney injuryintermittent hemodialysismajor adverse kidney eventsnet ultrafiltrationrenal recoveryrenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID41084798
PMCPMC12523464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.