Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084730›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025

Potential barriers to performing adapted physical activity in patients with digestive cancer: results of the prospective observational APACADIG study.

Clémence Trihan, Cindy Richard, Emeric Boisteau, Thomas Grainville, Géraldine Perkins, Claire Gouriou, Eugénie Rigault, Anne-Sophie Guerard, Etienne Le Brelot, Amélie Rebillard and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clémence TrihanRennes 1 University, rue Henri Le Guillou, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes 35000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3042-6942
Cindy RichardRennes 2 University, Rennes, France.
Emeric BoisteauRennes 1 University, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1831-6145
Thomas GrainvilleRennes 1 University, Rennes, France.
Géraldine PerkinsRennes 1 University, Rennes, France.
Claire GouriouRennes 1 University, Rennes, France.
Eugénie RigaultRennes 1 University, Rennes, France.
Anne-Sophie GuerardUniversité de Rennes Faculté de Médecine, Rennes, France.
Etienne Le BrelotRennes 2 University, Rennes, France.
Amélie RebillardRennes 2 University, Rennes, France.
Pascal HammelUniversity of Paris, Villejuif, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-4996
Astrid LièvreRennes 1 University, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adapted physical activity (APA) is key supportive care in cancer patients. Very few studies have evaluated APA in digestive cancers, and the eligibility and feasibility of an APA program in this population have not been clearly defined. Objectives: Primary objective: to analyze the reasons for failure of an APA program in digestive cancer patients. Secondary objectives: to assess patient eligibility, feasibility of an APA program, and the potential changes in patient quality of life, physical performance, and nutritional status. Design: APACADIG is a pilot, single-center, prospective non-randomized study. Methods: All consecutive patients with digestive cancer seen from January 18, 2021 to February 15, 2021, were proposed a supervised 2-month APA program. Results: Sixty-five consecutive patients (men 69%, median age 69.8 years old, PS 0/1: 78.5%) with mainly colorectal (38%) and pancreaticobiliary (35%) cancers were included. Forty-seven of these patients (72%) were eligible, and 22 (46.8%) accepted the APA program. The latter were more often active women, living in urban areas (59.1%) with higher socioeconomic status (40.9%). The barriers to APA were clinical, the cost of transport, lack of awareness of the benefits of APA, and a sedentary lifestyle before the cancer diagnosis. Withdrawal from APA was mainly due to changes in physical status. APA improved patients' physical performance (6-min walk test) (distance 516.1 m ± 102.7 m vs 414.5 m ± 111.9 m; Conclusion: Only one-sixth of the population completed the program, and we identified several barriers to APA.

Indexed as

adherencebarriersdigestive cancerseligibilityphysical activityrecruitment

Identifiers

PMID41084730
PMCPMC12515285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.