ArticleCureus2025
A Survey Assessment of Nuclear Medicine Trainees' Participation and Impact in Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences: A Single-Center Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) are essential forums for collaborative oncology decision-making. However, existing literature has primarily examined the role of attending specialists and has rarely differentiated effects by specialty. The contributions of trainees, particularly in nuclear medicine, have been largely overlooked, leaving a gap in understanding how their participation influences both educational outcomes and patient management. This study addresses this gap by systematically evaluating the perceived impact of nuclear medicine trainees in MCCs.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was distributed to 73 healthcare professionals at a tertiary medical center, including nuclear medicine specialists, trainees, and clinicians from surgery, oncology, and radiology. The survey included Likert-scale and multiple-choice questions to assess perceptions of trainee contributions to interprofessional collaboration, clinical decision-making, and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests were applied to analyze Likert-scale responses and compare responses between nuclear medicine and non-nuclear medicine specialists. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
resultsOf the 73 respondents, 57 (78.1%) indicated that nuclear medicine trainees enhanced interprofessional collaboration, while 56 (76.7%) reported a positive influence on patient care. Additionally, 60 (82.2%) perceived an educational benefit through enriched clinical knowledge. Chi-square analysis revealed no significant differences in perceptions across professional groups (p = 0.568). Reported barriers included inconsistent attendance, limited clinical experience, and time constraints.
conclusionNuclear medicine trainees play a valuable role in MCCs by enriching clinical discussions, supporting patient care, and contributing to professional development. To maximize their impact, structured learning opportunities, increased mentorship, and improved logistical support are recommended. These findings emphasize the importance of formally integrating trainees into MCC workflows to enhance both educational and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.