Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084678›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Meniscal Tears.

James Bottomley, Oday Al-Dadah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James BottomleyTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Shields, GBR.
Oday Al-DadahTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Shields, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The knee menisci are fibrocartilaginous structures that play a key biomechanical role in load transmission, shock absorption, stability, and, ultimately, preservation of articular cartilage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is vital in the assessment of meniscal pathology and guiding subsequent management options. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for isolated meniscal tears compared to subsequent arthroscopic findings. Methodology This observational study screened 334 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery. Preoperative knee MRI scan results using standardized and uniform protocols were compared to arthroscopic surgical findings to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of initial radiological reports. Results A total of 79 patients who underwent arthroscopy for isolated meniscal tears were included in the analysis. MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 83%, PPV of 96%, NPV of 63%, and accuracy of 89% for medial meniscal tears. In lateral meniscal tears, preoperative MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 68%, NPV of 87%, and accuracy of 81%. Conclusions This study demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy of MRI scans for both medial and lateral meniscal tears. However, radiological findings should not be used in isolation, but instead incorporated as a diagnostic adjunct in the wider clinical picture when making therapeutic decisions. Clinical acumen remains the priority in the context of evaluating these knee injuries.

Indexed as

accuracyarthroscopymagnetic resonance imagingmeniscal tearsensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID41084678
PMCPMC12515481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.