ArticleCureus2025
Ovarian Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case Report of Two Cases Highlighting Diagnostic and Management Challenges.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian ectopic pregnancy (OEP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening form of ectopic gestation. Although recognized as a distinct clinical entity, its pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management remain poorly defined. Clinical presentation is often nonspecific and may mimic acute pelvic pathologies such as ruptured corpus luteum, hemorrhagic ovarian cysts, or miscarriage in women presenting with vaginal bleeding. In some cases, it resembles a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) when the gestation cannot be localized on imaging, complicating preoperative diagnosis. Prompt recognition is critical to avoid severe hemorrhagic complications, and laparoscopy remains the mainstay of both diagnosis and treatment. We describe two cases with distinct clinical presentations: one involving a 34-year-old multiparous woman presenting with acute pelvic pain, vaginal bleeding, hemoperitoneum, and a hemorrhagic right ovarian lesion confirmed histologically as OEP, and another a 17-year-old nulliparous woman initially managed as a PUL who later presented with syncope, nausea, and vomiting, where laparoscopy revealed a bleeding ovarian mass, which is also confirmed histologically as OEP. OEP should be considered in reproductive-aged women presenting with acute abdominal pain, hemoperitoneum, and elevated beta human chorionic gonadotropin, even when ultrasound findings are inconclusive. These cases emphasize the need for a high index of suspicion and the role of laparoscopy in diagnosis and management. Early surgical intervention reduces morbidity and preserves ovarian function. Given its rarity and the absence of standardized guidelines, appropriate counseling is essential, and larger datasets are needed to inform future diagnostic and management protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.