ArticleCureus2025
Clinical and Microbiological Profile of Culture-Positive Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Care Center in North India.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Retrospective Study of Pathogen Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance in 283 Neonates with Bloodstream Infections at a Grade-A Tertiary Hospital in China, 2021-2024.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Sepsis in newborns is a major clinical concern, especially in resource-limited settings. Although blood culture remains the primary method for confirming infection and guiding treatment, its detection rate is often suboptimal. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence, clinical characteristics, maternal and neonatal risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance patterns linked to culture-confirmed neonatal sepsis in a tertiary care facility in North India. Materials and methods This prospective observational study was carried out over 18 months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, a tertiary care teaching hospital in Sitapur, India, enrolling 118 neonates aged 28 days or younger who presented with clinical signs suggestive of sepsis. Data on maternal and neonatal risk factors were collected using a pre-tested proforma. Blood cultures were processed using standard microbiological techniques, and antibiotic susceptibility was assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0. Significant risk factors associated with culture-positive sepsis were identified using binary logistic regression analysis. Results Among 118 neonates, 28% (33/118) had culture-positive sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.