ArticleCureus2025
Are There Sex Differences in Brain Activity in Response to Active Tactile Stimulation?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tactile information plays a crucial role in object recognition, spatial localization, and motor control. In elucidating the neural basis of these processes, it is critically important to clarify the underlying neural mechanisms of active tactile stimulation. This study aimed to examine brain activation patterns elicited by active tactile stimulation using stress balls of different hardness levels (soft, medium, and hard) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and to investigate their relationship with sex differences and subjective evaluations. Participants were 77 healthy right-handed young adults (37 males and 40 females) who performed a task involving gripping a stress ball at a force of 5 kg once per second under each condition. Following the scanning session, subjective ratings of hardness and comfort were obtained using a nine-point Likert scale. Across all conditions, activation was consistently observed in sensorimotor-related regions such as the postcentral gyrus, precentral gyrus, thalamus, and cerebellum, indicating stable engagement of these areas during active tactile processing. Notably, the medium condition elicited additional activation in higher-order cognitive and emotional regions, including the angular gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex, and hippocampus, suggesting that moderate stimulation may enhance introspective processing and emotional evaluation. Although no statistically significant differences were detected between sexes in the contrast analyses, subjective evaluations showed that, in the medium condition only, males rated the stimulation as significantly more pleasant than females. These findings indicate that active tactile stimulation primarily engages the sensorimotor network, while the strength and perceived comfort of the stimulus can influence emotional and cognitive processing. Furthermore, although clear sex-related differences in neural activity were not observed, perceptual differences between males and females may still occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.