ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2025
Time-series clustering analysis for treatment pattern of lasmiditan for 2 years from the initial prescription.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized machine learning prediction of next-day migraine persistence using digital headache diary data.Headache · 2026Article
- Innovative treatments for migraine: a new era.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disorder and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Although triptans and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used, a substantial proportion of patients show inadequate responses. Lasmiditan, a selective 5-HT1 Objectives: To characterize 2-year lasmiditan prescription patterns using time-series clustering. Design: A retrospective observational study using nationwide health insurance claims data in Japan. Methods: Data were extracted from the REZULT database for patients aged ⩾15 years diagnosed with migraine (ICD-10 code G43) between January 2022 and December 2024. Prescription claims were analyzed in 90-day intervals for up to 24 months after the initial lasmiditan prescription. Time-series clustering was applied to identify subgroups with distinct trajectories of lasmiditan use. Results: Lasmiditan was prescribed to 21,199 of 167,461 (12.7%) migraine patients (mean age 33.8 ± 10.3 years; 76.6% female). In the first 3 months, 86.2% received 50 mg, 12.8% received 100 mg, and 1.0% received both doses. About half were also prescribed analgesics, 66.7% triptans, and 33.9% prophylactic drugs. Lasmiditan prescriptions were gradually tapered over 2 years, with the most common long-term pattern being combination therapy with analgesics and triptans. Clustering identified three groups: Cluster 1 (massively continuous use), Cluster 2 (gradual tapering), and Cluster 3 (early discontinuation). Conclusion: This nationwide claims-based study provides the first real-world evidence of long-term lasmiditan prescribing patterns. The identification of three distinct trajectories highlights the heterogeneity of clinical practice. It underscores the need for further research on lasmiditan's optimal use, particularly regarding combination therapy and potential medication overuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.