ArticlePeerJ2025
DNA-based prediction of external ear morphology in the Chinese population: an exploratory study.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anthropometrical measurements of external ear between normal and diabetic patients.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The external human ear is a polymorphic and polygenic structure with individual uniqueness, making it a valuable target in forensic DNA phenotyping (FDP) studies. Previous genome-wide association studies have identified multiple genetic loci associated with variation in ear characteristics. However, research focused on predicting ear morphology within the context of FDP remains limited. This study aimed to develop DNA-based predictive models for external ear morphology in the Chinese population. Methods: Digital photographs of 675 volunteers were used to score 13 ear phenotypes, each categorized into three levels. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) was applied for genetic association analysis. Five predictive models-MLR, support vector machines, random forest, AdaBoost, and k-nearest neighbors-were developed and evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. Results: Genetic association analysis identified several influential single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) for each ear phenotype. Among the five models, AdaBoost and MLR demonstrated superior performance, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values above 0.7 for predicting absent tragus cases (level_0). To simplify classification, binary models incorporating genetic interactions were constructed for absent tragus cases. Specifically, the AdaBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.74, while the binary logistic regression (BLR) model reached an AUC of 0.72. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential forensic application of genetic markers in predicting ear morphology within the Chinese population, contributing to the advancement of FDP research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.