ReviewClinical optometry2025
African Facial Anthropometry and Spectacle Frame Design: A Review.
Review in Clinical optometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review explores the relationship between African facial anthropometry and spectacle frame design. Despite the global eyewear market's growth, a significant gap exists in designs accommodating African facial features. Through a comprehensive literature analysis, this review examines key anthropometric measurements relevant to eyewear fit across diverse African populations, current challenges in spectacle frame design, and emerging solutions. Findings reveal persistent underrepresentation of African facial measurements in global design standards, leading to poor fit, discomfort, and reduced compliance. The review identifies opportunities for innovative frame designs, material selection, and manufacturing approaches that could better serve African populations. Recommendations include increased anthropometric research across different African ethnicities, integration of digital technologies, and development of region-specific design parameters. This review contributes to the growing body of knowledge advocating for more inclusive and culturally appropriate eyewear solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.