ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis of Mood Disorders and Risk of Preeclampsia-Eclampsia.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Mood disorders and preeclampsia-eclampsia (PE) are two major public health problems. The genetic association of the two problems is unclear. We conducted a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the potential casual relationships between mood disorder subtypes (bipolar disorder, depression, manic/hyper symptoms) and PE. Methods: Summary statistics for bipolar disorder (7481 cases and 9250 controls), depression (13,559 cases and 435,855 controls), manic/hyper symptoms (3177 cases and 28,140 controls) were derived from IEU open GWAS project. Summary data for PE were obtained from FinnGen consortium (7965 cases and 211,852 controls) and IEU open GWAS project (2355 cases and 264,887 controls). Four methods were applied in our MR analysis, including the inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median and weighted mode. Meta-analysis method was used to assess the combined effect from two independent database. A series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to estimate the robustness of results. Results: The combined effect from two data sources indicated that there were casual associations between bipolar disorder and PE (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.08-1.22, Conclusion: Our findings provided evidence that bipolar disorder and depression are causally associated with PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.