ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2025
A Survey to Assess the Knowledge and Perceptions about Gene Therapy in Indian Haemophilia Patients.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel molecules including gene therapy are used to treat haemophilia. Little is known on patient perceptions about gene therapy. Present survey is to assess the knowledge and identify key educational gaps and concerns about gene therapy in Indian persons with haemophilia (PWH). An explorative, qualitative, closed questionnaire based survey was conducted recruiting adult PWH from 3 Centers in India. Data were collected through face-to-face surveys or the patients themselves filling the survey forms. Of the 415 complete questionnaires received from adult severe PWH, approximately half of the PWH felt that gene therapy is the best option for PWH, but only 31.2% showed their willingness to be a part of any gene therapy clinical trial, if available. About 57% of the PWH were unable to decide about participation in clinical trials and 11.7% of the participants would never consider receiving gene therapy. Major concerns were cost, side effects, duration of expression and rejection, infection and risk of liver cancer. The PWH expressed their desire for information on subjects like eligibility criteria, earlier trial data, and details on safety. The survey shows a low level of knowledge about gene therapy in PWH and identifies gaps in knowledge and a strong willingness to understand more on the potential risk: benefit profile of gene therapy. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-024-01945-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.