Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084552›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2025

Comparative Analysis of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with Cytarabine, Aclarubicin, and Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (D-CAG) Versus CAG Regimen in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Maowen Yuan, Yanhong Qiao, Ye Han, Jianghuizi Li, Xiaoru Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maowen YuanDepartment of Hematology, Xi'an Central Hospital, No. 65 Tangfang Street, Lianhu District, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710000 China.
Yanhong QiaoDepartment of Hematology, Xi'an Central Hospital, No. 65 Tangfang Street, Lianhu District, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710000 China.
Ye HanDepartment of Hematology, Xi'an Central Hospital, No. 65 Tangfang Street, Lianhu District, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710000 China.
Jianghuizi LiDepartment of Hematology, Xi'an Central Hospital, No. 65 Tangfang Street, Lianhu District, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710000 China.
Xiaoru LeiDepartment of Hematology, Xi'an Central Hospital, No. 65 Tangfang Street, Lianhu District, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710000 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one of the most prevalent types of acute leukemia in adults, markedly impacting the quality of life, especially in the elderly. The clinical effectiveness of decitabine and the cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GAC) regimen alone in AML patients is limited, and current research on the application of decitabine combined with CAG in AML patients is relatively scarce. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the therapeutic efficacy of CAG regimen alone and in combination with decitabine in patients with AML. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 150 patients with AML who underwent treatment in our hospital from July 2018 to March 2023. They were categorized into two groups based on the differences in their treatment regimens: the CAG group (

Indexed as

Acute myeloid leukemiaCAG regimenCellular immunityClinical efficacyDecitabineProgressionSafetyT lymphocyte subsets

Identifiers

PMID41084552
PMCPMC12515181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.