ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2025
Validation of Point-of-Care Testing Device for Serum Ferritin Estimation in an Outpatient Facility in India.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ferritin as a diagnostic point-of-care marker in iron deficiency anemia: a narrative review and clinical implications.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron deficiency anaemia is the most common cause of anemia among pregnant and lactating women. Personalised management and precision in anemia diagnosis requires ferritin estimation. The current laboratory-based serum ferritin tests are a bottleneck for further management of anemia. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the point-of-care testing (POCT) device for serum ferritin estimation among people in different age groups in a secondary care health facility in India, compared to the gold standard laboratory-based enhanced chemiluminescence-based immunoassay. A sample of 40 participants attending the 50-bed secondary healthcare facility in Faridabad, Haryana, was included. Venous blood samples were collected to estimate serum ferritin levels using the POCT device and the laboratory-based enhanced chemiluminescence-based immunoassay (gold standard). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient were calculated to assess diagnostic accuracy. This study enrolled 40 participants between the ages of 5 and 45 years, with the majority being females (67.5%). Based on hemoglobin estimation using the Hemocue 301, 50% were anemic. The POCT device demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.3% (95% CI: 49.9-92.2), specificity of 96.0% (95% CI: 79.6-99.9), and diagnostic accuracy of 87.5% (95% CI: 72.1-93.3) compared to the laboratory-based enhanced chemiluminescence-based immunoassay. The mean percent difference (S.D.) based on Bland Altman analysis was 35.9% (37.8) (95% C.I. 23.9-48.1%), with lower and upper limits of agreement as -38.0%, and 109.9% respectively. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.98). The ferritin POCT device's high specificity and moderate sensitivity make it suitable for diagnosing iron deficiency. Its ability to provide rapid turnaround of test results can facilitate the early initiation of appropriate treatment, leading to improved clinical outcomes. Further research, including validation studies, should be undertaken. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-024-01943-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.