Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084550›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2025

Validation of Point-of-Care Testing Device for Serum Ferritin Estimation in an Outpatient Facility in India.

Abhishek Jaiswal, Thejas Achary, Areeba Khanam, Aravind M, Mohan Bairwa, Archana Singh, Kapil Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abhishek JaiswalDepartment of Community Medicine, IMS, BHU, Varanasi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1289-5425
Thejas AcharyNational Centre of Excellence and Advanced Research on Anemia Control, Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1162-2334
Areeba KhanamNational Centre of Excellence and Advanced Research on Anemia Control, Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5279-5798
Aravind MCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0009-0002-9588-5173
Mohan BairwaCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7763-2530
Archana SinghDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kapil YadavCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5627-0734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron deficiency anaemia is the most common cause of anemia among pregnant and lactating women. Personalised management and precision in anemia diagnosis requires ferritin estimation. The current laboratory-based serum ferritin tests are a bottleneck for further management of anemia. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the point-of-care testing (POCT) device for serum ferritin estimation among people in different age groups in a secondary care health facility in India, compared to the gold standard laboratory-based enhanced chemiluminescence-based immunoassay. A sample of 40 participants attending the 50-bed secondary healthcare facility in Faridabad, Haryana, was included. Venous blood samples were collected to estimate serum ferritin levels using the POCT device and the laboratory-based enhanced chemiluminescence-based immunoassay (gold standard). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient were calculated to assess diagnostic accuracy. This study enrolled 40 participants between the ages of 5 and 45 years, with the majority being females (67.5%). Based on hemoglobin estimation using the Hemocue 301, 50% were anemic. The POCT device demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.3% (95% CI: 49.9-92.2), specificity of 96.0% (95% CI: 79.6-99.9), and diagnostic accuracy of 87.5% (95% CI: 72.1-93.3) compared to the laboratory-based enhanced chemiluminescence-based immunoassay. The mean percent difference (S.D.) based on Bland Altman analysis was 35.9% (37.8) (95% C.I. 23.9-48.1%), with lower and upper limits of agreement as -38.0%, and 109.9% respectively. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.98). The ferritin POCT device's high specificity and moderate sensitivity make it suitable for diagnosing iron deficiency. Its ability to provide rapid turnaround of test results can facilitate the early initiation of appropriate treatment, leading to improved clinical outcomes. Further research, including validation studies, should be undertaken. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-024-01943-3.

Indexed as

AnemiaDiagnostic accuracyFerritin estimationHaemoglobin estimationHealthcare facilityIndiaPoint of care testing

Identifiers

PMID41084550
PMCPMC12515160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.