ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
The Dyadic Relationship of Illness Uncertainty, Social Support, and Coping Styles in Patients with OSA and Their Co-Residents: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Mediation Model Analysis.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) patients experience significant illness uncertainty, impacting coping. Social support mitigates uncertainty, while coping styles influence management. Research predominantly examines individual patients, neglecting dyadic interactions between patients and co-residents. Objective: To examine the dyadic interrelationships of illness uncertainty, social support, and coping styles in OSA patient-co-resident pairs using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM). Methods: A cross‑sectional study of 242 patient-co‑resident dyads from a tertiary hospital examined self‑reported illness uncertainty, social support, and coping styles. APIM analyzed actor and partner effects. Results: Patients reported higher illness uncertainty (P<0.001), whereas co‑residents reported greater social support (P<0.001). Social support was positively associated with active coping and negatively associated with passive coping within dyads. Actor effects indicated that illness uncertainty in both patients and co-residents was associated with lower levels of their own social support, which in turn correlated with decreased active coping and increased passive coping (β=0.203 and 0.038, P<0.05). Partner effects analyses indicated that one member's uncertainty or social support was associated with the other member's coping via specific indirect paths. Conclusion: The findings reveal bidirectional, dyadic interdependence among illness uncertainty, social support, and coping styles in OSA patient-co-resident pairs, with social support appearing as a prominent within‑individual associative pathway. These results support considering family‑oriented strategies that aim to strengthen mutual social support to be explored further as a means to promote adaptive coping in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.