ArticleJBMR plus2025
Internal validation of an 11-yr prediction model for new vertebral fractures using the vertebral bone quality score: a prospective cohort study.
Article in JBMR plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The vertebral bone quality score is used to assess bone quality using magnetic resonance imaging. This study aimed to perform internal validation of a previously developed prediction model for the occurrence of new vertebral fractures (NVFs) over 11 yrs using the vertebral bone quality score. A prospective cohort of 157 participants from the Minami-Aizu study, with lumbar magnetic resonance imaging follow-ups over 11 yrs, was analyzed from an initial 200-participant cohort, applying the exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of NVFs over 11 yrs. The predictors included age, sex, existing vertebral fractures at baseline, and VBQ scores. The prediction model, constructed using multiple logistic regression analysis and the Akaike information criterion, was evaluated for its discrimination power using the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). Internal validation was performed using the bootstrapping method with model reconstruction through regularization to correct for overfitting. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, predictors with a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.