ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025
Tree canopy cover and injurious pedestrian falls: a location-based case-control study.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite about half a million injurious pedestrian falls occurring annually in the United States, prevention of pedestrian falls is under studied. Sidewalk damage from street trees is a known risk for falls; however, tree canopy cover might reduce falls in summer months by lowering ambient temperatures. We conducted pilot research to assess whether emergency medical services (EMS) data could be used to implement a multi-city, location-based case-control study investigating the association between tree canopy cover and locations of injurious pedestrian falls. Case locations (n = 497) were places where EMS responded to a pedestrian fall occurrence between April and September of 2019. Matched control locations (n = 994) were selected from intersections, street segments, and ramp segments that existed in 2019. Percent tree canopy cover was measured within a 100-m radial buffer of each location. Median tree canopy coverage at fall locations was 8%, compared to 14% for control locations. In adjusted analyses, higher tree canopy cover was inversely associated with fall locations (adjusted OR across the inter-quartile range of canopy cover = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.74), suggesting higher tree canopy cover is associated with lower pedestrian falls risk. Methodological challenges and solutions to implementing and interpreting the location-based, case-control design with EMS data are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.