ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Disclosing the Decision to Decline Breast Screening and/or Breast Cancer Treatment Due to Concerns About Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background or contextOverdiagnosis and overtreatment have been acknowledged as harms of the NHS Breast Screening Programme (BSP) due to the uncertainty around if, or how, non-invasive and invasive cancers identified through screening will progress. Importance is therefore placed on encouraging individuals to make an informed choice about whether to participate in screening and any follow-on interventions. Even though all screening programmes generally state explicitly that individuals should have the freedom to choose, research into wider cancer screening programmes shows how disclosing a decision to decline may be regarded as problematic by others. However, literature exploring experiences of disclosing the decision to decline breast screening or subsequent interventions within the UK context is limited.
objectiveWe explore women's experiences of disclosing the decision to decline screening, treatment and/or other recommended medical interventions after being invited to the NHS BSP, to understand how making the decision to decline breast screening and/or breast cancer treatment was received by others.
designSemi-structured interviews. SETTING AND
participantsTwenty women who had made the decision to decline screening, treatment and/or other interventions recommended after being invited to the NHS BSP were recruited through social media, online forums and word of mouth.
resultsSome of the women discussed responses from their family and friends when disclosing their decision to decline and explained how they received supportive responses from some and negative responses from others. Difficulties in disclosing their intention to decline healthcare professionals were also discussed by some of the women. Receiving unsupportive responses meant that some of the women felt hesitant about how and where they disclosed their decision.
conclusionsTo varying degrees, the findings revealed the burden of having to explain and account for the decision to decline and manage the potential reaction to this as not acceptable. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Before recruitment and data collection commenced, we sought feedback from an individual with lived experience in declining breast cancer screening and treatment due to concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment. This individual provided valuable insights on the study design and the most effective methods for recruiting participants from the targeted population. Additionally, a topic guide was developed for the semi-structured interviews, which was then tested through a pilot interview with the same individual. The feedback from this pilot interview was instrumental in refining and improving the topic guide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.