ArticleCancer research and treatment2026
Prognostic Impact of Organ-Specific Metastasis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metastatic organ distribution characteristics and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Prognostic stratification is essential in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to guide treatment decisions. While the TNM staging system has evolved to refine the M category based on metastatic burden, it does not account for differences in prognosis based on the specific organ affected. This study evaluates whether incorporating organ-specific metastasis improves prognostic discrimination in stage IV NSCLC. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Korean Central Cancer Registry (2014-2018). Patients with stage IV NSCLC were classified according to the 9th edition TNM classification: M1b (single-organ, single metastasis), M1c1 (multiple metastases within a single organ), and M1c2 (multiple organ metastases). Survival outcomes were compared across groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Among 3,165 patients, 56.5% had single-organ metastases, while 43.5% had multiple organ metastases. Median overall survival (OS) was longest in M1b (8.0 months), followed by M1c1 (6.0 months), and shortest in M1c2 (5.9 months) (p < 0.001). However, survival varied by metastatic organ. Liver, adrenal, and uncommon-site metastases were associated with significantly worse OS, even among M1b patients. Some M1b and M1c1 patients with high-risk organ metastases had worse survival than M1c2 patients, challenging the TNM-defined prognostic hierarchy. Conclusion: The current TNM M category does not fully capture the prognostic impact of metastatic organ involvement. Incorporating organ-specific metastases into staging and prognostic models could refine risk stratification and improve personalized treatment approaches for stage IV NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.