ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2025
Spin-Flip TDDFT within the Sternheimer Formulation: A Gaussian and Plane Wave Implementation.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Newton-X platform for mixed quantum-classical dynamics.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the first implementation of spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory (SF-TDDFT) within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation in the Sternheimer formulation including the use of the noncollinear kernel. The noncollinear kernel was stabilized by introducing a screening method for the numerical integration, realizing a robust scheme of excited energy and gradient calculations of SF-TDDFT using generalized gradient approximation functionals. The implementation is evaluated by benchmark calculations of vertical excitation energies and optimized molecular geometries. The benchmark for vertical excitations consists of 19 excitations with high level of theory reference data from the QUESTDB. An underestimation of vertical excitation energies was observed for the PBE and PBE0 functionals, as seen by their average deviations of -0.3 eV. The benchmark for optimized geometries consists of 25 optimized structures with high level of theory, comprising CCSD, CISD, and FCI data, and 10 reference structures optimized with other implementations of collinear and noncollinear SF-TDDFT. The optimized structures using PBE and PBE0, with a noncollinear kernel, were found to be close to the high-level reference structures, with mean deviations of 0.010 and -0.004 Å, respectively. The extension to the auxiliary density matrix method (ADMM) is also presented. We found an average deviation of 0.003 Å in the calculated bond lengths when employing the ADMM for the PBE0 functional.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.