ArticleProsthetics and orthotics international2026
Perception of ankle foot orthoses by individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
Article in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) use ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) to address balance and functional deficits.
objectivesThis study was conducted to further understand how individuals with CMT perceive the effects of AFO use on function. STUDY
designCross-sectional online survey.
methodsIndividuals with CMT provided free text responses to 3 questions: (Q1) What would you change about your orthosis if you could? (Q2) What activities does your ankle foot orthosis improve? (Q3) What activities does your ankle foot orthosis limit? Two independent reviewers evaluated responses and used an inductive approach to identify primary themes. Percent agreement between reviewers was calculated for each primary theme.
resultsA total of 310 individuals participated, and 5 primary themes were identified for each question. Q1 primary themes included ease of use or functionality, compatibility with shoes, durability, appearance, and comfort or fit. Q2 primary themes included walking, standing, balance and stability, physical health, and activities of daily life. Q3 primary themes were related to shoes or clothing, balance or inclines, mobility, long-term use, and general activities. Average percent agreement between reviewers was 63% (17%).
conclusionsStudy results align with previously reported data collected using patient-reported outcome surveys. In addition, participants highlighted concerns that are not usually addressed in orthosis-related questionnaires. These data emphasize areas of improvement for orthotic treatment relevant to individuals with CMT and which may help guide future research aiming to improve functional outcomes and compliance with orthotic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.