Trial reportProsthetics and orthotics international2026
Reliability of a novel in vivo optical strain assessment of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses.
Trial report in Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnkle-foot orthoses (AFO) design, including geometry and material selection, is tailored to meet specific clinical objectives. Understanding AFO mechanical behavior may provide insight into the effect of design considerations on the functional benefits to AFO users. Mechanical characteristics of AFOs are primarily assessed using strain gauges or computational modeling, both of which have limitations.
objectivesDetermine the test-retest reliability of weight-bearing carbon fiber dynamic AFO (CDO) surface strain measurements obtained using digital image correlation (DIC). STUDY
designProspective, randomized, cross-sectional reliability study.
methodsCDO displacement and surface strain were measured at three strut locations using DIC while 30 participants deflected the CDO into dorsiflexion at three time points. Test-retest reliability of strain measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), minimum detectable change (MDC), and percentage MDC values.
resultsMinimum detectable change and ICC values were between 0.005%‒0.010% and 0.14‒0.76, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient were generally higher at more distal strut locations and larger ankle dorsiflexion angles, with a mean ICC across locations of 0.55. Proximal strain was 31%‒59% lower than strain in middle and distal regions, respectively. Lower absolute strain values in the proximal location resulted in higher average relative measurement error (12.2%) compared to the distal and middle locations (4.4% and 6.5%, respectively).
conclusionsThree-dimensional digital image correlation can provide reliable estimates of CDO surface strain, supporting its use for evaluating orthosis mechanical behavior. Better understanding of in vivo strain behavior across the CDO surface may assist with future device design and prescription to improve functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.