SynthesisJournal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists2026
Mechanical behavior and laboratory survival of thin and ultrathin ceramic crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe evidence on the mechanical reliability of thin and ultrathin ceramic crowns is inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to collect all the data on thin and ultrathin ceramic crowns, assessing their fatigue survival, mechanical behavior, and optical properties within laboratory measures.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, concluding on May 20, 2025. All relevant studies were screened for eligibility; only English-language, peer-reviewed articles containing extractable data on thin or ultrathin ceramic crowns (measuring 0.6 to 0.9 mm and ≤ 0.5 mm, respectively) were included in this review. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software from the Cochrane Collaboration, with p ≤ 0.05.
resultsA total of 14 studies were included. Both thin and ultrathin crowns demonstrated durability under thermomechanical loading for 5 years during clinical simulation. The fatigue survival rates under stepwise loading presented conflicting findings, which may be attributed to variations in procedural methodologies or cementation protocols. The mechanical strength of thin and ultrathin crowns was sufficient to endure occlusal stresses exceeding 1100 N. However, the fracture resistance of thin and ultrathin crowns was found to be statistically significantly lower than that of thick ceramic crowns (p = 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, all crowns cemented with conventional cement exhibited statistically significant weakness compared to those bonded with resin cement (p ≤ 0.001). Lithium disilicate and nano lithium disilicate crowns revealed more stable optical properties than zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, and all exhibited more staining with longer exposure time to colored drinks. Resin ceramic crowns revealed the highest microleakage rate compared with zirconia and composite crowns.
conclusionsLaboratory evidence suggests that thin and ultrathin ceramic crowns exhibit favorable survival rates and fracture resistance. Crowns fabricated from high-strength ceramics such as 3Y-TZP performed better with conventional cements, whereas crowns cemented with adhesive resin protocols yielded similar fracture resistance regardless of crown thickness or material. Optical properties and microleakage are crown-material and time-dependent; however, evidence is scarce and remains insufficient. Thin and ultrathin ceramic crowns offer a conservative treatment option. Adhesive cementation enhances their survival, while the choice of ceramic material, cementation protocol, and luting shade is critical for optimal esthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.