ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
Accelerating birth equity using collaborative systems mapping.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecognizing the complexity of cross-sector collaboration, holistic and innovative approaches are required to achieve birth equity. This project applied systems thinking and the Remove, Repair, Remediate, Restructure, and Provide (R4P) framework to understand and address systemic barriers to birth equity. This paper describes the systems thinking activities used to identify system actors and critical actions they can take to advance birth equity.
methodsWe applied systems thinking tools through the R4P lens in a series of collaborative and iterative activities. We conducted an environmental scan and synthesis of reports with recommendations to improve birth equity. In addition, we engaged a diverse group of birth equity actors, including those from federal agencies, state and local health departments, community-based organizations, funders, academic institutions, health systems and national nonprofits, through systems mapping workshops to co-create a series of birth equity tools.
resultsOur collaborative efforts produced an innovative Birth Equity Ecosystem Map, Birth Equity Iceberg, and interactive Birth Equity Action Map. The Birth Equity Ecosystem Map is a comprehensive synthesis of recommendations defining an equitable ecosystem, while the Birth Equity Iceberg summarizes insights on systemic barriers to achieving birth equity most critical to address in the next 5 years. The Birth Equity Action Map is an interactive and strategic tool, synthesized from diverse system actors' experiences and perspectives, that describes needed actions and responsible actors for each systemic barrier identified. We probed for and organized actions by the five dimensions of the R4P framework to encourage comprehensive action to achieve equity. The Birth Equity Action Map and connected resources developed through this project help actors identify actions they can work on to overcome identified systemic barriers to birth equity in their community and key partners for each.
conclusionsThe tools we developed demonstrate how systems thinking and R4P can offer a more holistic and effective approach to tackling issues of birth equity and lead to more actionable insights, thereby contributing significantly to the public health goal of achieving equity. These tools can be used by birth equity advocates to assess and leverage their strengths, resources and unique context to identify priorities and collectively advance birth equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.